{"id":5594,"date":"2020-03-04T01:28:30","date_gmt":"2020-03-03T22:28:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/pentagon-navy-debate-carrier-deployment-cycles\/5594\/"},"modified":"2020-03-04T01:28:30","modified_gmt":"2020-03-03T22:28:30","slug":"pentagon-navy-debate-carrier-deployment-cycles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/pentagon-navy-debate-carrier-deployment-cycles\/5594\/","title":{"rendered":"Pentagon, Navy Debate Carrier Deployment Cycles"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p>On Monday, U.S. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday pushed back on the idea that the Navy&#039;s 36-month carrier training \/ deployment schedule &quot;hasn&#039;t worked for years,&quot; as Secretary of Defense Mark Esper told the House Armed Services Committee last week.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In testimony Wednesday, Esper told the committee that the Pentagon&#039;s delay in producing the Navy&#039;s long-term shipbuilding plan stems in part from questions about the Optimized Fleet Response Plan (OFRP). &ldquo;An assumption in the [Navy&#039;s force structure assessment] is that the OFRP works. The OFRP hasn&rsquo;t worked for years, so why should we assume it will work in the future?&quot; Esper&nbsp;said.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The OFRP is a three-year maintenance, training and sustainment schedule built around a seven-month-per-cycle deployment at sea. Over the course of the past five years, OFRP has been used to manage five carrier strike groups, and the Navy has not hit the plan&#039;s timetable targets for maintenance and readiness. Two parallel reviews &#8211; one at the Navy level and one at the Pentagon level &#8211; are currently under way.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, Adm. Gilday pointed out that despite departures from the OFRP schedule, the fleet has made &quot;every deployment that we&#039;ve been directed to do.&quot; Speaking at the WEST conference in San Diego, Gilday said that he doesn&#039;t &quot;necessarily agree with the secretary&#039;s assessment&quot; of OFRP, &quot;with all due respect,&quot; Navy Times reported. However, Gilday has still directed an assessment of the OFRP schedule.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Gilday also used the opportunity to explain why the Navy&#039;s FY2021 budget calls for decommissioning the first four littoral combat ships (the first two hulls in each of the two variants). These vessels were sidelined in 2016 as part of a restructuring of the LCS program, and they were set aside as test platforms. They have been undergoing evaluation ever since in order to get to the root of the &quot;issues with hull maintenance and engineering that kept plaguing us and kept us from getting those ships to sea,&rdquo; Gilday said. They are not combat ready and have not received upgrades like the rest of the LCS hulls, and Gilday said that the lightly-armed ships would require $2 billion to make ready &#8211; funds that they Navy could use elsewhere.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>maritime-executive<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, U.S. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday pushed back on the idea that the Navy&#039;s 36-month carrier training \/ deployment schedule &quot;hasn&#039;t worked for years,&quot; as Secretary of Defense Mark Esper told the House Armed Services Committee last week.&nbsp; In testimony Wednesday, Esper told the committee that the Pentagon&#039;s delay in producing &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5595,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[1864,2595,2593,2594,2433,2589,2590,1089,2591,2588,2592],"class_list":["post-5594","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-maritime-news","tag-carrier","tag-cycles","tag-debate","tag-deployment","tag-gilday","tag-lcs","tag-littoral-combat-ships","tag-navy","tag-navy-times","tag-ofrp","tag-pentagon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5594","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5594"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5594\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/media\/5595"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5594"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5594"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5594"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}