<\/p>\n
The report confirms previous research that suggested recording malpractices are widespread in maritime industry, which seriously questions the capacity of the current regulatory framework to prevent fatigue and mitigate its effects, according to the report\u2019s authors, Dr. Raphael Baumler, Ms. Yvette deKlerk, Dr. Michael Ekow Manuel and Dr. Laura Carballo Pi\u00f1eiro.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
This is particularly concerning amid the on-going crew change crisis<\/a>, where many seafarers are serving well beyond their contractual terms and having to take on additional tasks to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the WMU.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cThe analysis indicates that insufficient manning is the root cause of violations especially during peak workload conditions. Imbalance between workload and manning levels indicate that flag States do not always fulfil responsibilities, nor do they ensure that shipowners carry out theirs with due regard to efficient and sufficient manning levels on board ships.\u201d the WMU said in a press release.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The fear of failing inspections and creating problems for shipping companies can outweigh the obligation to genuinely comply with international regulations, the report shows.\u00a0\u201cEmployment insecurity accompanied by financial incentives contributes to an environment where adjustment instead of accuracy is the logical outcome. For seafarers, the sole objective of recording hours is to confirm compliance and avoid disruptions to the schedule,\u201d the WMU said.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cIn such an environment, requirements for reporting work\/rest hours are seen, by seafarers, as merely a paper exercise. Additionally, software intended to support recordkeeping seems \u2018gamed\u2019 for compliance. Instead of improving accuracy, they effectively incentivise crew to adjust their records.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n According to the report, \u201cthey are trapped in cognitive dissonance, where deviance is normalised.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cMany companies appear disinterested in seafarers\u2019 feedback on this issue and flag State surveys are limited to reviewing paperwork with no verification of the reality of work on board. Inevitably the effectiveness of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code must be questioned,\u201d the WMU stated.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n According to Dr. Cleopatra Doumbia-Henry, President of the WMU, \u201cSeafarers have a right to the protections set out in international maritime conventions and in particular in the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 as amended as well as in the IMO STCW Conventions as amended. It is well known that fatigue leads to adverse impacts on health and wellbeing as well as increasing the risks of maritime accidents. This report is a wake-up call to regulators, industry and seafarers themselves. The system is flawed with respect to implementation and needs serious attention!\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The research received financial financial support from the ITF Seafarers\u2019 Trust. \u201cThe findings are devastatingly comprehensive. Now the on us in on flags States, ports States, industry and unions to come together for the benefit of the seafarers to facilitate cultural change and restore the credibility of international maritime regulations,\u201d said Dave Heindel, Chair of the ITF Seafarers\u2019 Trust.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The authors of the report, titled A Culture of Adjustment<\/a>,<\/em>\u00a0propose three main areas in need of urgent attention, including a research-based model for determining safe manning, a\u00a0review of the effectiveness of the ISM code, and improving the relationship between shore and ship personnel.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n