{"id":11886,"date":"2020-06-18T14:54:01","date_gmt":"2020-06-18T11:54:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/taylor-energy-disputes-source-of-recovered-oil-at-mc20-well\/11886\/"},"modified":"2020-06-18T14:54:01","modified_gmt":"2020-06-18T11:54:01","slug":"taylor-energy-disputes-source-of-recovered-oil-at-mc20-well","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/taylor-energy-disputes-source-of-recovered-oil-at-mc20-well\/11886\/","title":{"rendered":"Taylor Energy Disputes Source of Recovered Oil at MC20 Well"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p>The former oil company Taylor Energy is suing the U.S. Coast Guard to block a bill for $43 million in removal costs related to an oil discharge at a former Taylor production site off the coast of Louisiana.<\/p>\n<p>The leak at the site has been active since 2004, when Taylor Energy&#039;s MC20 platform was destroyed by Hurricane Ivan: storm surge from the hurricane set off an underwater mudslide that destroyed the platform and buried its subsea infrasructure under 100 feet of sediment.&nbsp;In 2007, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) directed Taylor Energy to remove the platform deck and &nbsp;sub-sea debris, decommission the oil pipeline, attempt to contain the leaking oil and plug the wells that were deemed highest risk. Taylor completed the ordered scope of work in 2010.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In 2015, an investigation by SkyTruth and the Associated Press determined that the ongoing rate of leakage at the site was higher than previously estimated. The Coast Guard &nbsp;revisited its own analysis of the scope of the pollution from MC20, and it revised its own estimate upwards by a significant margin. In October 2018, the federal on scene coordinator (FOSC) issued an order requiring Taylor Energy to install a containment system to address the ongoing leakage. One month later, the FOSC took over partial authority for containing the spill and contracted its own salvage team. The contractor installed a subsurface oil containment system at the site in April 2019 and began recovering more than 1,000 gallons of oil per day.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>To date, the cost of the project has come to about $43 million and is expected to rise as containment operations continue. In a letter sent June 2, the Justice Department and the Coast Guard indicated an intent to sue Taylor Energy to recover this expense and to impose civil penalties.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In its new suit, Taylor <a href=\"https:\/\/pdfhost.io\/v\/4Dy4Sbw4z_taylor_energy_suitpdf.pdf\">asserts<\/a>&nbsp;that the Coast Guard has overstepped its authority &quot;in direct violation of the United States Constitution,&quot; and the firm is petitioning the court to release it from any obligation to pay the cost. Taylor maintains that the oil removal project was unnecessary and that &quot;any oil that has been collected at the MC20 Site by the Coast Guard [or its contractor] is not oil sourced to the Taylor Energy wells at MC20.&quot; It also contends that the Coast Guard&#039;s contractor caused damage at the well site, resulting in&nbsp;&quot;significant increases in sheens on the Gulf&rsquo;s surface.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Taylor Energy is headed by Phyllis M. Taylor, a prominent philanthropist who chairs the Patrick F. Taylor Foundation. The firm&nbsp;ceased oil and gas drilling operations in 2008, and according to its website, &quot;it exists today solely to respond to the MC-20 incident.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>maritime-executive<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The former oil company Taylor Energy is suing the U.S. Coast Guard to block a bill for $43 million in removal costs related to an oil discharge at a former Taylor production site off the coast of Louisiana. The leak at the site has been active since 2004, when Taylor Energy&#039;s MC20 platform was destroyed &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11887,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[1134,7810,7813,2370,7811,7815,166,6016,7814,7812,7809],"class_list":["post-11886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-maritime-news","tag-coast-guard","tag-constitution","tag-disputes","tag-energy","tag-justice-department","tag-mc20","tag-oil","tag-recovered","tag-source","tag-taylor","tag-taylor-energy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11886\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/media\/11887"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.al-sindbad.net\/rest\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}